|
Post by frosty on Dec 31, 2006 23:24:52 GMT -4
Well I see it three ways:
1. He's put to death, avenging the millions he killed and putting an end to the life of a terrorist dictator.
2. He has life in prison, and all of us suffer when we turn 18(or whenever) because we have to pay taxes to have him locked up. Plus he'll have free food and an out of date SEGA that we have to pay for! I turn 18 in 3 years.
3. We release him back to power so he can continue his genocide and massacar of his own people.
I choose 1. and thats what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Force_Flow on Dec 31, 2006 23:30:28 GMT -4
Ah, hell… That's easier when you think of it.
|
|
|
Post by hk47fan on Dec 31, 2006 23:47:37 GMT -4
Oh, he deserved death. The only good thing out of all of this is that he died, and Iraqi citizens can live freely without worry now. It's a good thing he died, but his death will bring many others.
|
|
noneko
Recruit
[M:2000]
[H:3]
Posts: 49
|
Post by noneko on Jan 14, 2007 13:19:07 GMT -4
Ugh, that trial was a mockery of justice. Don't get me wrong, he committed genocide and should have been sentenced to death, but the International Court should have been the one to do it. As evil as he is, he still deserved a fair trial. Which he did not get.
Also, the actual execution? Was an infringement on basic human rights. It was appalling. When I read about the details in the paper, I was ashamed of the human race. No matter who he was, mocking a man before he is killed and setting sectarian opponents to do the killing? They might as well have not bothered with the trial.
The whole fiasco was appalling. I admire the countries that came out and said that they could not support the execution. And now Iraq will have to deal with the fallout.
|
|
|
Post by hk47fan on Jan 14, 2007 14:36:58 GMT -4
I gotta go with Noneko on that.
What really upsets me is that this shouldv'e been done years ago......he was senteced to death for killing a bunch of people in 1982, right? That was 1982 and NOW they are hanging him?! It's horrible because the only reason he was in custody is because Bush went over there for personnal reasons or whyever he went over there.
So, basically, that's saying if Bush hadn't been president Saddam would probably still be in office today.
And the worst part is that the Iraqi people will be the people who feel the aftermath of this. Since we are America, we are just oh so untouchable, so the people who feel the pain of Bush's mistake will be people who were innocent and were just living in a war zone.
|
|
darthnotrevan
Commander
[M:0]
Your official House: M.D./ KotOR nut [H:2]
Posts: 346
|
Post by darthnotrevan on Jan 15, 2007 1:10:05 GMT -4
Ugh, that trial was a mockery of justice. Don't get me wrong, he committed genocide and should have been sentenced to death, but the International Court should have been the one to do it. As evil as he is, he still deserved a fair trial. Which he did not get. Also, the actual execution? Was an infringement on basic human rights. It was appalling. When I read about the details in the paper, I was ashamed of the human race. No matter who he was, mocking a man before he is killed and setting sectarian opponents to do the killing? They might as well have not bothered with the trial. The whole fiasco was appalling. I admire the countries that came out and said that they could not support the execution. And now Iraq will have to deal with the fallout. I'm gonna have to agree with you on that one.
|
|